merchscape

Other => Spam => Archive => Topic started by: Orange on December 12, 2011, 04:33:27 pm


Title: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 12, 2011, 04:33:27 pm
Well I see that Swag wants admin so bad so I've set up a little 1 week tester. It's basically Swag gets admin for 1 week and we evaluate Swags moves etc. If Swag seems happy and prepared I may make it permanent but if I demote you again, it doesn't mean I don't want you as admin. Who supports?
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Spark on December 12, 2011, 10:33:09 pm
Hey orange after his week can you try that with me? It's just a suggestion you don't have to it's up to you I would just want to see how I would do.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Yipyapzap on December 12, 2011, 10:36:37 pm
Hey orange after his week can you try that with me? It's just a suggestion you don't have to it's up to you I would just want to see how I would do.

That's a no. You're not the one going for admin.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 12, 2011, 10:36:55 pm
Oh Gawd...
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Spark on December 12, 2011, 10:49:01 pm
Alright never mind then.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 12, 2011, 10:54:41 pm
I haven't even started this 'TEST' yet lol.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Spark on December 12, 2011, 10:57:01 pm
Yea I know but he wouldn't allow me trying at least lol. Probably would fail anyway.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Vault-tec Frog on December 13, 2011, 08:29:19 pm
This is perfect...
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 13, 2011, 08:43:08 pm
I support this. However, I think all serious admin applications should receive this 'test'.
Has Swag even been online? I've seen nothing from him. The only time I saw him online was for a half a second and he asked for admin.. yet again..
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 13, 2011, 08:52:26 pm
I know he's kinda inactive....
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Vault-tec Frog on December 13, 2011, 08:57:04 pm
I'm active
(brownie points)
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 13, 2011, 09:00:46 pm
I know he's kinda inactive....
I wonder what hes doing. O.o
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 13, 2011, 09:09:41 pm
Um lets wonder...
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 13, 2011, 09:11:53 pm
Um lets wonder...
(http://i1179.photobucket.com/albums/x398/Natrith/fap_fap_fap_fap_RE_Best_XXX_Ever-s3.png)
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 13, 2011, 09:14:24 pm
I thought swag is ment to be active when I'm not around? I haven't seen him active for a while now....

And lol
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 13, 2011, 09:16:55 pm
I thought swag is ment to be active when I'm not around? I haven't seen him active for a while now....

And lol
This isn't meant to be rude in anyway towards Swag, but it seems he only logs in to ask for admin then dips out until the next time.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 13, 2011, 09:28:49 pm
Ummmmmm
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 13, 2011, 09:32:38 pm
Ummmmmm
That's from my P.O.V.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Yipyapzap on December 13, 2011, 10:55:08 pm
He has already informed us he is grounded, and he has told me around the holiday season he will be on less. You have to cut him some slack, (mostly) everyone has a life, and go do other stuff, he's just busy.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 13, 2011, 10:57:39 pm
He has already informed us he is grounded, and he has told me around the holiday season he will be on less. You have to cut him some slack, (mostly) everyone has a life, and go do other stuff, he's just busy.
He informed us he was grounded quite awhile ago, and these log in patterns were still the same before that. I am cutting him some slack, but I'm actually putting my thought into things.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 13, 2011, 11:00:34 pm
Before you start arguing, wash your hands.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 13, 2011, 11:06:32 pm
Before you start arguing, wash your hands.
I was actually thinking of doing that.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 13, 2011, 11:07:32 pm
Okie but I do not like arguments........
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 13, 2011, 11:11:46 pm
Okie but I do not like arguments........
Want a cookie?
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 13, 2011, 11:13:40 pm
Sure.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 13, 2011, 11:18:43 pm
Sure.
(http://i42.tinypic.com/f26gdw.jpg)
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 13, 2011, 11:21:57 pm
What does it say? You drew on me :/ plus the pic is a little big....
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 13, 2011, 11:25:34 pm
What does it say? You drew on me :/ plus the pic is a little big....
It says 'Helena <3's you'. I guess my phone takes large photos. Sorry.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 13, 2011, 11:26:48 pm
Yay <3 u tooo hehe
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 13, 2011, 11:27:46 pm
Yay <3 u tooo hehe
me irl:
:D
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 13, 2011, 11:29:54 pm
Has swag actually made atleast 1 reply to this thread? It's his lucky chance....
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 13, 2011, 11:31:32 pm
Has swag actually made atleast 1 reply to this thread? It's his lucky chance....
Not that I recall. He has on his admin app, however
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 13, 2011, 11:33:27 pm
...
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Ethan on December 13, 2011, 11:53:43 pm
Why do you even need any more admins?
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 14, 2011, 03:42:48 am
Why do you even need any more admins?
We don't have any regular admins.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Ethan on December 14, 2011, 02:55:05 pm
Orange and YipYapZap aren't admins? What do you call it?
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 14, 2011, 09:02:52 pm
Orange and YipYapZap aren't admins? What do you call it?
nawp. THEY IZ OWNERS!
Owners = our kings
Admins = pretty much like owner. but not quite.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Ethan on December 15, 2011, 12:01:45 am
Owners administer, admins administer; therefore owners are admins.

Besides which, two admins/owners is more than enough; we don't even have a game yet.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Yipyapzap on December 15, 2011, 12:08:47 am
Owners administer, admins administer; therefore owners are admins.

Besides which, two admins/owners is more than enough; we don't even have a game yet.

Someone else understands, thank goodness.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 15, 2011, 07:50:06 pm
Owners administer, admins administer; therefore owners are admins.

Besides which, two admins/owners is more than enough; we don't even have a game yet.
No ****.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 15, 2011, 09:01:51 pm
Wow...
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 15, 2011, 09:59:48 pm
Ethan, do you think I'm an idiot? But if you look at the way everyone is ranked, administrator is a rank LOWER than Owner, co-owner. In other websites, like my own I am the admin/owner.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Ethan on December 16, 2011, 12:39:49 am
Jesus, why are you mad at me? All I'm saying is that owners are admins, I'm not saying that admins are owners.

We don't need any more admins. There are about twenty accounts on this forum, about six or seven of which are active; for a server forum with >=20 people, you really only need one owner and a mod or two, not two owners, an admin, two head mods, and three mods.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Helena on December 16, 2011, 06:35:19 am
Jesus, why are you mad at me? All I'm saying is that owners are admins, I'm not saying that admins are owners.

We don't need any more admins. There are about twenty accounts on this forum, about six or seven of which are active; for a server forum with >=20 people, you really only need one owner and a mod or two, not two owners, an admin, two head mods, and three mods.
Correct. Now we are on the same page. If we get all this successfully going, advertise, etc.. Then more people will join, more applications, etc. Then maybe another admin, or another moderator will be useful. But for now we are only a forum hoping to grow soon. And as my grandmother always says "Jesus has nothing to do with it". Even if I do not believe in religion and all of that bulls***, I agree with that line.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Ethan on December 16, 2011, 03:01:02 pm
Well, as a forum we really wont go anywhere. As a server I suppose it's possible, but there you go; no server yet.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Koplen on December 18, 2011, 03:16:00 am
Well Lets see, I told you orange already but I will say to all. I was out for a while because my mom died and her funeral was three states away. I was out for a couple of days because of fone issues. Now I am trying my best to be active. Sorry for th past but lets forget about it please.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 18, 2011, 12:46:06 pm
I 100% understand, if you would like us to forget, I will. Wuv u!!!
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Koplen on December 20, 2011, 11:22:25 pm
When will this test begin?
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 21, 2011, 01:30:54 am
Um
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Dialgaz on December 21, 2011, 12:17:32 pm
Test? for what exactly :P
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 21, 2011, 01:08:16 pm
Test? for what exactly :P

Stupid troll above^
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Koplen on December 21, 2011, 07:14:48 pm
The test for my admin position, this will not be taking place any time soon because Ido not want to be admin any more, thanks
Koplen
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Orange on December 21, 2011, 08:37:51 pm
Ok. -Closed-
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Yipyapzap on December 21, 2011, 11:55:21 pm
I must add one more thing. Koplen you said you did not want to fight over the position with anybody. Are you sure you want to give up on it?
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Koplen on December 23, 2011, 02:08:01 am
No, I am not giving up.
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: VISSTICK PRO on December 23, 2011, 02:39:16 am
You dont want the position and you are still going for it ?....

-facepalm-
Title: Re: TEST
Post by: Koplen on December 23, 2011, 07:20:34 am
No shut up ::trollface:: Lol